CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM BILLS IN CONGRESS
A criminal justice reform bill that would create a national criminal justice commission has been introduced in the House and Senate. The text of the proposed bill states, “developments over the intervening 50 years require once again that Federal, State, tribal, and local governments, law enforcement agencies, including rank and file officers, civil rights organizations, community-based organization leaders, civic organizations, religious institutions, business groups, and individual citizens come together to review evidence and consider how to improve the criminal justice system.”
BRANDON’S TAKE: A similar version of this bill was introduced years back by former senator Jim Webb. That bill almost became law.
Both the House and Senate versions of this new bill have bipartisan support. I think there is a good chance this bill could pass. However, the bill will not automatically result in any legislative changes. The bill is merely another opportunity to “study” the problems with the system and to make recommendations for changing things.
We have had enough talk. We know what the problems are. We simply need to fix them. Thus, while I support the general idea behind the bill, I would prefer that Congress focus on offering real criminal justice reform.
2. H.R. 1184: Family Telephone Connection Protection Act of 2017
Introduced by Bobby Rush (D-IL) in the House, this bill would amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require the Federal Communications Commission to prescribe rules regulating inmate telephone and video service rates, and for other purposes. The goal would be to reduce the cost of inmate calling from jails and prisons.
BRANDON’S TAKE: The bill has laudable goals, but with only two co-sponsors it has virtually zero chance of advancing in the Republican-controlled House.
3. H.R. 64: Federal Prison Bureau Nonviolent Offender Relief Act of 2017
Introduced each new session of Congress by Sheila Jackson Lee (R-TX) since 2003, the bill would allow federal prisoners 45 and over to be released once they have served half of their sentence.
BRANDON’S TAKE: The bill is a good idea, but not going anywhere.
4. H.R. 956: Effective Assistance of Counsel in the Digital Era Act
Introduced in the House, the bill would exempt e-mails to attorneys from monitoring by the BOP.
BRANDON’S TAKE: This legislation is much needed. The proposal seems uncontroversial, so the bill may have a chance of passage IF it can get a hearing in the House Judiciary Committee—which is not certain.
Recommended for you
Ex Parte Communications By Judge With Jury Required Reversal Of Convictions
At Martin Bradley III’s trial for racketeering, mail fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering, the district court had two ex parte communications with the jury. Bradley’s defense lawyers did not become aware of notes until after his appeal. Bradley filed a 2255 motion arguing, in addition to other things, that the court had violated Rule…
Supervised Release Cannot Be Revoked After Supervision Term Ends
Anthony Holman’s supervised release was revoked for failing to pay restitution and picking up a new charge. However, the violation petition was not submitted until after Holman’s term of supervision had already expired. No summons was pending at the time either. Generally, whenever a U.S. Probation Officer believes that a defendant has violated his or…
Burrage Applies Retroactively To Cases On Collateral Review
In Burrage v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 881 (2014), the Supreme Court held that “at least where use of the drug distributed by the defendant is not an independently sufficient cause of the victim’s death or serious bodily injury, a defendant cannot be liable under the penalty enhancement provision of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C)…
