\u201cWe conclude that the district court abused its discretion by impermissibly delegating judicial authority to the probation officer as to whether Yarbrough would participate in a vocational training program,\u201d the court wrote. \u201cA court impermissibly delegates judicial authority when it gives a probation officer authority to decide whether a defendant will participate in a treatment program,\u201d the court held.<\/p><\/blockquote>\r\nFor similar reasons, the appeals court also vacated the mental health condition. See United States v. Yarbrough<\/a>, No. 15-20236\u00a0(5th Cir. 2017) (unpublished).\r\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
After George Yarbrough was sentenced, the court included in its written judgment two special conditions of supervised release that required the defendant to: \u201c\u2019participate in a vocational training program as deemed necessary and approved by the probation officer\u2019 and \u2018participate in a mental health program as deemed necessary and approved by the probation officer.\u2019\u201d Yarbrough…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1781,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[325],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Delegation of Judicial Authority | Supervised Released | Sentencing.net<\/title>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n