{"id":1785,"date":"2017-02-23T15:26:23","date_gmt":"2017-02-23T15:26:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/?p=1785"},"modified":"2019-11-12T11:33:17","modified_gmt":"2019-11-12T16:33:17","slug":"certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/habeas-corpus\/certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis","title":{"rendered":"Certificate Of Appealability Standard Not The Same As Merits Determination, Supreme Court Holds"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

A certificate of appealability is required to appeal the denial of federal habeas relief. According to federal statute, a certificate of appealability may only be granted \u201cif the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.\u201d 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 2253(c)(2). In some cases, prisoners can demonstrate probable success on the merits of ineffective assistance to claim before granting a certificate of appealability.The Supreme Court has made clear in prior cases that a certificate of appealability should issue if \u201cjurists of reason could disagree with the district court\u2019s resolution of his constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.\u201d Miller-El v. Cockrell<\/em>, 537 U. S. 322, 327 (2003). \u201cFull consideration of the factual or legal bases adduced in support of the claims\u201d is prohibited. Id.<\/em> at 336.<\/p>\n

Despite the lax standard for a certificate of appealability, federal courts have near uniformly required prisoners to show probable success on the merits of any claim before granting a certificate of appealability.<\/p>\n

Because of this, the Supreme Court in Buck v. Davis<\/em> was again asked to clarify the standard for issuing a certificate of appealability.\u00a0Buck v. Davis<\/em><\/a>, No. 15-8049 (2017).<\/p>\n

Buck, a Texas prisoner on death row, previously sought federal habeas relief. After the Supreme Court decided Martinez v. Ryan<\/em>, 566 U. S. 1 (2012), and Trevino v. Thaler<\/em>, 569 U. S. ___ (2013), Buck moved for relief from judgment in his federal habeas proceeding pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6).<\/p>\n

Buck argued that he was entitled to relief under Rule 60(b)(6) because his state post-conviction attorney failed to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. During the penalty phase of Buck\u2019s trial for capital murder, an expert was called by the defense who testified that Buck\u2019s future dangerousness was increased because he was \u201cblack.\u201d Unsurprisingly, the jury recommended a death sentence. Buck argued that it was ineffective assistance for his attorney to have elicited this testimony before the jury.<\/p>\n

Martinez<\/em> and Trevino<\/em> opened the door for Buck to seek Rule 60 relief. In Martinez<\/em> the Court held that \u201ca prisoner may establish cause for procedural default if (1) the state courts did not appoint counsel in the initial-review collateral proceeding, or appointed counsel in that proceeding . . . was ineffective under the standards of Strickland v. Washington<\/em>, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); and (2) the underlying . . . claim is a substantial one, which is to say that . . . the claim has some merit.\u201d Buck<\/em>, slip op. at 9.<\/p>\n

Martinez<\/em> and Trevino<\/em> are only applicable in jurisdictions where the prisoner is required or effectively required to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for the first time in a post-conviction<\/a> proceeding. The federal system is an example of the latter since claims of ineffective assistance are more appropriately reserved for a 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255 motion. Massaro v. United States<\/em>, 538 U.S. 500 (2003).<\/p>\n

The Fifth Circuit in considering whether to grant Buck a certificate of appealability looked at whether he had in fact shown \u201cextraordinary circumstances\u201d warranting Rule 60 relief. The Supreme Court held this was improper.<\/p>\n

Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the Court, held that the certificate of appealability \u201cinquiry, we have emphasized, is not coextensive with a merits analysis.\u201d According to the Chief Justice, \u201cthe question for the Fifth Circuit was not whether Buck had \u2018shown extraordinary circumstances\u2019 \u2026 Those are ultimate merits determinations the panel should not have reached. We reiterate what we have said before: A \u2018court of appeals should limit its examination [at the COA stage] to a threshold inquiry into the underlying merit of the claims,\u2019 and ask \u2018only if the District Court\u2019s decision was debatable.\u2019\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Further, the Chief Justice explained:<\/p>\n

That a prisoner has failed to make the ultimate showing that his claim is meritorious does not logically mean he failed to make a preliminary showing that his claim was debatable. Thus, when a reviewing court (like the Fifth Circuit here) inverts the statutory order of operations and \u2018first decides the merits of an appeal, . . . then justifies its denial of a COA based on its adjudication of the actual merits,\u2019 it has placed too heavy a burden on the prisoner at the COA stage. Miller-El<\/em>, 537 U. S., at 336\u2013337. Miller-El<\/em> flatly prohibits such a departure from the procedure prescribed by \u00a72253.<\/p>\n

The statute sets forth a two-step process: an initial determination whether a claim is reasonably debatable, and then if it is an appeal in the normal course. We do not mean to specify what procedures may be appropriate in every case. But whatever procedures are employed at the COA stage should be consonant with the limited nature of the inquiry.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Next, the Court turned to whether the court had erred in denying Buck Rule 60 relief. Relying on Trevino and other factors, the Court concluded that Buck had shown extraordinary circumstances warranting Rule 60 relief. \u201cOur law punishes people for what they do, not who they are. Dispensing punishment on the basis of an immutable characteristic flatly contravenes this guiding principle,\u201d the Court held. Thus, it was ineffective assistance for Buck\u2019s trial counsel to have introduced the racially-based testimony during the penalty phase of the trial, and equally ineffective assistance for Buck\u2019s state post-conviction counsel to have failed to raise this claim in his state post-conviction proceedings. Accordingly, the judgment of the Fifth Circuit was reversed and the case was remanded for further proceedings.<\/p>\n

The Martinez<\/em> and Trevino<\/em> cases are a new, narrow way for federal prisoners to potentially re-open their federal habeas proceedings, or seek 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 2241 relief, when because of the absence of counsel, or due to ineffective \u00a7 2255 counsel, a substantial claim of ineffective assistance was not raised in an initial \u00a7 2255 motion.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A certificate of appealability is required to appeal the denial of federal habeas relief. According to federal statute, a certificate of appealability may only be granted \u201cif the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.\u201d 28 U.S.C. \u00a7 2253(c)(2). In some cases, prisoners can demonstrate probable success on the…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1788,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[328],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nCertificate Of Appealability | Federal Habeas Relief | Sentencing.net<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A prisoner seeking a certificate of appealability is required to appeal\u00a0the denial of federal habeas relief. Ineffective Assistance can be a part of appeal.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/habeas-corpus\/certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Certificate Of Appealability | Federal Habeas Relief | Sentencing.net\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A prisoner seeking a certificate of appealability need not demonstrate success on the merits. Rather, the inquiry is much narrower and circumscribed.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/habeas-corpus\/certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Sentencing.net\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/facebook.com\/attorneysample\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"www.facebook.com\/attorneysample\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-02-23T15:26:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-12T16:33:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/supreme-court-545534_1920.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1440\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Brandon Sample\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Certificate Of Appealability | Federal Habeas Relief | Sentencing.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"A prisoner seeking a certificate of appealability need not demonstrate success on the merits. Rather, the inquiry is much narrower and circumscribed.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@attorneysample\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@attorneysample\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Brandon Sample\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/habeas-corpus\/certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/habeas-corpus\/certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis\",\"name\":\"Certificate Of Appealability | Federal Habeas Relief | Sentencing.net\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/habeas-corpus\/certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/habeas-corpus\/certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/supreme-court-545534_1920.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-02-23T15:26:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-12T16:33:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/#\/schema\/person\/a5f0c3a713f6c398da681e9a6f26520c\"},\"description\":\"A prisoner seeking a certificate of appealability is required to appeal\u00a0the denial of federal habeas relief. Ineffective Assistance can be a part of appeal.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/habeas-corpus\/certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/habeas-corpus\/certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/habeas-corpus\/certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/supreme-court-545534_1920.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/supreme-court-545534_1920.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1440,\"caption\":\"Federal Habeas,ineffective assistance ,certificate of appealability\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/habeas-corpus\/certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Certificate Of Appealability Standard Not The Same As Merits Determination, Supreme Court Holds\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/\",\"name\":\"Sentencing.net\",\"description\":\"News & Legal Updates By Attorney Brandon Sample\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/#\/schema\/person\/a5f0c3a713f6c398da681e9a6f26520c\",\"name\":\"Brandon Sample\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/500ddb8cb38ac4f20b8f38b401474946?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/500ddb8cb38ac4f20b8f38b401474946?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Brandon Sample\"},\"description\":\"Brandon Sample is an attorney, author, and criminal justice reform activist. Brandon\u2019s law practice is focused on federal criminal defense, federal appeals, federal post-conviction relief, federal civil rights litigation, federal administrative law, and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/brandonsample.com\",\"www.facebook.com\/attorneysample\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/attorneysample\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Certificate Of Appealability | Federal Habeas Relief | Sentencing.net","description":"A prisoner seeking a certificate of appealability is required to appeal\u00a0the denial of federal habeas relief. Ineffective Assistance can be a part of appeal.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/habeas-corpus\/certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Certificate Of Appealability | Federal Habeas Relief | Sentencing.net","og_description":"A prisoner seeking a certificate of appealability need not demonstrate success on the merits. Rather, the inquiry is much narrower and circumscribed.","og_url":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/habeas-corpus\/certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis","og_site_name":"Sentencing.net","article_publisher":"https:\/\/facebook.com\/attorneysample","article_author":"www.facebook.com\/attorneysample","article_published_time":"2017-02-23T15:26:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-12T16:33:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1440,"url":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/supreme-court-545534_1920.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Brandon Sample","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Certificate Of Appealability | Federal Habeas Relief | Sentencing.net","twitter_description":"A prisoner seeking a certificate of appealability need not demonstrate success on the merits. Rather, the inquiry is much narrower and circumscribed.","twitter_creator":"@attorneysample","twitter_site":"@attorneysample","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Brandon Sample","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/habeas-corpus\/certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis","url":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/habeas-corpus\/certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis","name":"Certificate Of Appealability | Federal Habeas Relief | Sentencing.net","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/habeas-corpus\/certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/habeas-corpus\/certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/supreme-court-545534_1920.jpg","datePublished":"2017-02-23T15:26:23+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-12T16:33:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/#\/schema\/person\/a5f0c3a713f6c398da681e9a6f26520c"},"description":"A prisoner seeking a certificate of appealability is required to appeal\u00a0the denial of federal habeas relief. Ineffective Assistance can be a part of appeal.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/habeas-corpus\/certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/sentencing.net\/habeas-corpus\/certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/habeas-corpus\/certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/supreme-court-545534_1920.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/supreme-court-545534_1920.jpg","width":1920,"height":1440,"caption":"Federal Habeas,ineffective assistance ,certificate of appealability"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/habeas-corpus\/certificate-of-appealability-buck-v-davis#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Certificate Of Appealability Standard Not The Same As Merits Determination, Supreme Court Holds"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/#website","url":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/","name":"Sentencing.net","description":"News & Legal Updates By Attorney Brandon Sample","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/#\/schema\/person\/a5f0c3a713f6c398da681e9a6f26520c","name":"Brandon Sample","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/500ddb8cb38ac4f20b8f38b401474946?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/500ddb8cb38ac4f20b8f38b401474946?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Brandon Sample"},"description":"Brandon Sample is an attorney, author, and criminal justice reform activist. Brandon\u2019s law practice is focused on federal criminal defense, federal appeals, federal post-conviction relief, federal civil rights litigation, federal administrative law, and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).","sameAs":["https:\/\/brandonsample.com","www.facebook.com\/attorneysample","https:\/\/twitter.com\/attorneysample"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1785"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1785"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1785\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1788"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1785"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1785"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1785"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}