{"id":85856,"date":"2018-12-17T13:02:10","date_gmt":"2018-12-17T18:02:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/?p=85856"},"modified":"2019-11-05T15:54:32","modified_gmt":"2019-11-05T20:54:32","slug":"domestic-terrorism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/appeal\/domestic-terrorism","title":{"rendered":"Domestic Terrorism: Sentencing Appeal in the Infamous D.C. Sniper Case"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\t

April brought us the bomber who terrorized Austin, Texas, for two weeks with random mail-bomb attacks. That type of domestic terrorism, however, is nothing new.<\/p>\n

Domestic Terrorism: The D.C. Sniper Case in 2002<\/h2>\n

Rewind to October 2002 in the Maryland-D.C.-Virginia area. As you may recall, the so-called D.C. Sniper terrorized that entire region for three weeks. Everyone was on edge. Why? Because people who were simply doing everyday things \u2013 pumping gas, mowing the lawn, putting groceries into the trunk in a supermarket parking lot \u2013 became domestic terrorism targets. Indeed, the random shootings paralyzed the D.C. region, much like Austin was paralyzed before the bomber finally met his demise.<\/p>\n

\"domestic

Domestic Terrorism<\/p><\/div>\n

When all the facts were revealed in the D.C. Sniper case, two perpetrators were prosecuted \u2013 John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo. It was later learned that the shootings were carried out, 14 in all, by the pair shooting at random people through a small hole in the trunk of a Blue Chevy Caprice. Muhammad was the mastermind of the deadly rampage and was much older than Malvo, who was 17 years old at the time. It appeared that Malvo behaved as some type of apprentice to the murderous Muhammad. Yet, Malvo was involved as the shooter in some of the killings.<\/p>\n

Muhammad ultimately received the death penalty for his domestic terrorism crimes. Malvo, however, was spared that fate. The jury in his case sentenced him to life without parole, rather than the only other choice of the death penalty. Recent U.S. Supreme Court opinions, however, may have given Malvo an opening for a credible sentencing appeal.<\/p>\n

Changes in Criminal Sentencing Law Since 2002<\/h2>\n

In 2002-2003, when the D.C. Sniper case was tried, mandatory life-without-parole sentences were in effect in most states, even for violent juvenile offenders. Malvo was a juvenile, 17, at the time of the D.C. Sniper crimes, and he was sentenced to life without parole, though it was not necessarily mandatory in his case.<\/p>\n

Two U.S. Supreme Court cases since that time have now given Malvo a reason for a sentencing appeal. First, in 2012, the Court in Miller v. Alabama<\/em><\/a> determined that a mandatory life-without-parole sentence for a juvenile offender violates the Eighth Amendment\u2019s prohibition of \u201ccruel and unusual punishment.\u201d The Court reasoned that a mandatory sentence takes away a judge\u2019s ability to consider a juvenile\u2019s youth and the family\/home environment when imposing sentence. \u00a0While a court could still sentence a juvenile to life without parole, the court must do so by looking at all the facts of the case. It cannot be made mandatory by the legislature. This is true even in domestic terrorism cases.<\/p>\n

Second, in 2016, the Court in Montgomery v. Louisiana<\/em><\/a>, recognized that the holding of Miller<\/em> should be made retroactive. That is, that mandatory life-without-parole sentences decided prior to Miller <\/em>can be re-litigated because making the sentence mandatory was unconstitutional.<\/p>\n

Malvo\u2019s Domestic Terrorism Sentencing Appeal<\/h2>\n

The recent Montgomery<\/em> decision opens up an opportunity for Malvo. As a juvenile sentenced to a life-without-parole sentence, he believes Montgomery <\/em>makes him eligible for his sentence to be revisited. A federal judge confirmed that eligibility earlier this year, ruling that Malvo should get a new sentencing hearing<\/a>. Wanting to keep Malvo\u2019s sentence as is, the Virginia Attorney General has appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, and an appellate hearing will be held in the very near future.<\/p>\n

Malvo\u2019s attorney argues that circumstances have changed and that Malvo should be allowed to appeal and have his sentence reviewed because he is a different person. Now 32 years old, Malvo is no longer under the spell of John Muhammad\u2019s domination. Rather, Malvo\u2019s attorney maintains, Malvo is back to the kind, compassionate person he was in his youth.<\/p>\n

The State of Virginia, by contrast, will likely argue during a sentencing appeal, that Montgomery<\/em> does not change any circumstances for Malvo because his sentence was not mandated by the legislature. Rather, a jury determined that he should receive life without parole after a sentencing hearing. More specifically, Miller <\/em>and Montgomery<\/em>, the State will argue, are only concerned with life-without-parole sentences that were mandatory.<\/p>\n

Only time will tell what the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals will do. It is important to note, however, that even if Malvo\u2019s sentencing appeal hearing is allowed to proceed, it is very possible that he will not get a reduced sentence. Malvo\u2019s crimes were particularly horrific. There are many more juveniles in the criminal justice system who have more sympathetic stories to tell, and who have committed less serious offenses.<\/p>\n

Brandon Sample, Esq. is an experienced sentencing advocate<\/a>, practicing in federal courts throughout the country. For a free consultation<\/a>, call 802-444-HELP today. <\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

April brought us the bomber who terrorized Austin, Texas, for two weeks with random mail-bomb attacks. That type of domestic terrorism, however, is nothing new. Domestic Terrorism: The D.C. Sniper Case in 2002 Rewind to October 2002 in the Maryland-D.C.-Virginia area. As you may recall, the so-called D.C. Sniper terrorized that entire region for three…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":87336,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[344],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nDomestic Terrorism | Infamous D.C. Sniper Case | 802-444-4357<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"This article discusses the Supreme Court opinions on mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles, and the D.C. Sniper domestic terrorism case.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/appeal\/domestic-terrorism\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Domestic Terrorism | Infamous D.C. Sniper Case | 802-444-4357\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"This article discusses the Supreme Court opinions on mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles, and the D.C. Sniper domestic terrorism case.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/appeal\/domestic-terrorism\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Sentencing.net\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/facebook.com\/attorneysample\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"www.facebook.com\/attorneysample\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-12-17T18:02:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-11-05T20:54:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/sniper_1547129002.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1026\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Brandon Sample\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Domestic Terrorism | Infamous D.C. Sniper Case | 802-444-4357\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"This article discusses the Supreme Court opinions on mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles, and the D.C. Sniper domestic terrorism case.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@attorneysample\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@attorneysample\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Brandon Sample\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/appeal\/domestic-terrorism\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/appeal\/domestic-terrorism\",\"name\":\"Domestic Terrorism | Infamous D.C. Sniper Case | 802-444-4357\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/appeal\/domestic-terrorism#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/appeal\/domestic-terrorism#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/sniper_1547129002.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-12-17T18:02:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-11-05T20:54:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/#\/schema\/person\/a5f0c3a713f6c398da681e9a6f26520c\"},\"description\":\"This article discusses the Supreme Court opinions on mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles, and the D.C. Sniper domestic terrorism case.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/appeal\/domestic-terrorism#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/appeal\/domestic-terrorism\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/appeal\/domestic-terrorism#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/sniper_1547129002.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/sniper_1547129002.jpg\",\"width\":1280,\"height\":1026,\"caption\":\"domestic terrorism\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/appeal\/domestic-terrorism#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Domestic Terrorism: Sentencing Appeal in the Infamous D.C. Sniper Case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/\",\"name\":\"Sentencing.net\",\"description\":\"News & Legal Updates By Attorney Brandon Sample\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/#\/schema\/person\/a5f0c3a713f6c398da681e9a6f26520c\",\"name\":\"Brandon Sample\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/500ddb8cb38ac4f20b8f38b401474946?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/500ddb8cb38ac4f20b8f38b401474946?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Brandon Sample\"},\"description\":\"Brandon Sample is an attorney, author, and criminal justice reform activist. Brandon\u2019s law practice is focused on federal criminal defense, federal appeals, federal post-conviction relief, federal civil rights litigation, federal administrative law, and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/brandonsample.com\",\"www.facebook.com\/attorneysample\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/attorneysample\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Domestic Terrorism | Infamous D.C. Sniper Case | 802-444-4357","description":"This article discusses the Supreme Court opinions on mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles, and the D.C. Sniper domestic terrorism case.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/appeal\/domestic-terrorism","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Domestic Terrorism | Infamous D.C. Sniper Case | 802-444-4357","og_description":"This article discusses the Supreme Court opinions on mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles, and the D.C. Sniper domestic terrorism case.","og_url":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/appeal\/domestic-terrorism","og_site_name":"Sentencing.net","article_publisher":"https:\/\/facebook.com\/attorneysample","article_author":"www.facebook.com\/attorneysample","article_published_time":"2018-12-17T18:02:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-11-05T20:54:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1280,"height":1026,"url":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/sniper_1547129002.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Brandon Sample","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Domestic Terrorism | Infamous D.C. Sniper Case | 802-444-4357","twitter_description":"This article discusses the Supreme Court opinions on mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles, and the D.C. Sniper domestic terrorism case.","twitter_creator":"@attorneysample","twitter_site":"@attorneysample","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Brandon Sample","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/appeal\/domestic-terrorism","url":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/appeal\/domestic-terrorism","name":"Domestic Terrorism | Infamous D.C. Sniper Case | 802-444-4357","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/appeal\/domestic-terrorism#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/appeal\/domestic-terrorism#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/sniper_1547129002.jpg","datePublished":"2018-12-17T18:02:10+00:00","dateModified":"2019-11-05T20:54:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/#\/schema\/person\/a5f0c3a713f6c398da681e9a6f26520c"},"description":"This article discusses the Supreme Court opinions on mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles, and the D.C. Sniper domestic terrorism case.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/appeal\/domestic-terrorism#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/sentencing.net\/appeal\/domestic-terrorism"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/appeal\/domestic-terrorism#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/sniper_1547129002.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/01\/sniper_1547129002.jpg","width":1280,"height":1026,"caption":"domestic terrorism"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/appeal\/domestic-terrorism#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Domestic Terrorism: Sentencing Appeal in the Infamous D.C. Sniper Case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/#website","url":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/","name":"Sentencing.net","description":"News & Legal Updates By Attorney Brandon Sample","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/#\/schema\/person\/a5f0c3a713f6c398da681e9a6f26520c","name":"Brandon Sample","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/500ddb8cb38ac4f20b8f38b401474946?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/500ddb8cb38ac4f20b8f38b401474946?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Brandon Sample"},"description":"Brandon Sample is an attorney, author, and criminal justice reform activist. Brandon\u2019s law practice is focused on federal criminal defense, federal appeals, federal post-conviction relief, federal civil rights litigation, federal administrative law, and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).","sameAs":["https:\/\/brandonsample.com","www.facebook.com\/attorneysample","https:\/\/twitter.com\/attorneysample"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85856"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=85856"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85856\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/87336"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=85856"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=85856"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sentencing.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=85856"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}