Against<\/em> First Step<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\nOn the one side, supporters of the\u00a0Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act, like Sen. Grassley, seek a much more comprehensive criminal justice package. It makes substantive changes to both prison programs and<\/em><\/strong> federal sentencing laws. That is why it has the title Sentencing Reform<\/em> and Corrections Act. (Emphasis added).<\/p>\nQuite simply, the senior senators who authored the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act understand that making changes for inmates already in prison, or who are planning to exit, is all well and good, but it does nothing to address the mandatory minimum sentences that are responsible for flooding the prison entrances with inmates in the first place. Stated differently, mandatory minimums, which are largely responsible for the mass incarceration in this country need to be addressed. The Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act does address mandatory minimums, and shortens them in several key ways. First Step, by contrast, does nothing to ease mandatory minimums.<\/p>\n
Sen. Dick Durbin, the chief author of the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act, recognizes \u201cYou don\u2019t get many opportunities around here to do anything meaningful or substantive. . . . Let\u2019s not waste this one. Let\u2019s get this right.\u201d<\/p>\n
In sum, the Senators are essentially saying that real substantive criminal justice reform is finally on the table. This is an opportunity to do what needs to be done for the criminal justice system, rather than go with some non-substantive half-measure that kicks the can down the road for another generation.<\/p>\n
Those who opposed First Step include several prominent Democratic and Republican senators; more than 100 civil rights organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union; and former Attorney General Eric Holder, who stated \u201cMomentum for sentencing reform is being derailed by an effort that is misguided, ideological and outdated. . . . The narrow \u2018prison reform\u2019 bill won\u2019t deliver the transformative change we need.\u201d<\/p>\n
\nThe First Step\/Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act Debate \u2013 For<\/em> First Step<\/strong><\/strong>\nSentencing Reform and Corrections Act<\/p><\/div><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
On the other side, supporters of First Step say that putting sentencing provisions (most importantly mandatory minimums) into the mix will kill First Step or any criminal justice reform entirely. Conservative Republicans still believe in the antiquated notion that giving any ground on mandatory minimums will make them look \u201csoft on crime.\u201d<\/p>\n
Representative Hakeem Jeffries (D. New York) who authored First Step says that the prison bill is not the end, but rather \u201cthe end of the beginning on a journey undertaken to eradicate our mass incarceration epidemic in America.\u201d\u00a0 Stripped to its essence, First Step supporters are saying that \u2018something is better than nothing.\u2019<\/p>\n
More than 100 former federal prosecutors support First Step. Conservative groups and faith-based groups support the bill.<\/p>\n
What is the Next Step<\/strong>?<\/p>\nThe ball is in the Senate\u2019s court. That means that Senate Majority Leader McConnell (R. Kentucky) must be part of the process. Sen. McConnell has not been a trustworthy or helpful senator regarding criminal justice reform in the past, so it remains to be seen whether he will allow negotiation on First Step.<\/p>\n
SRCA supporters certainly hope that there will be time and room to find compromise and put some sentencing reform into First Step. Sen. McConnell, however, could try to push First Step, as is, through the Senate. While that would not be an uncharacteristic move (he had been responsible for killing the\u00a0Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act in the past), Sen. Grassley, who opposes First Step, is close to Sen. McConnell. Not having Sen. Grassley on his side might give Sen. McConnell pause.<\/p>\n
We all now must pause to see what happens next.<\/p>\n
For sentencing advice, representation, and advocacy, contact Brandon Sample, Esq.\u00a0 Call 802-444-HELP for a free consultation<\/a> today.\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The House of Representatives recently passed the so-called \u201cFirst Step Act,\u201d which is very different from the \u201cSentencing Reform and Corrections Act\u201d that is still bouncing around the Senate. I discussed in a previous article, the many details of the House\u2019s \u201cFirst Step Act\u201d (First Step). Let\u2019s take a closer look at the debate. Some…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":86090,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[606,314],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\n
First Step Act and Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act Differences<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n