Criminal Justice Reforms in NY Rely on a “Save More Money” Mantra

Advocates seeking criminal justice reform in New York are now attempting to appeal to their peers by using more conservative arguments. More specifically, advocates are focusing on driving awareness of just how expensive the current system is to taxpayers.

New Yorkers United for Justice (NYUJ) recently hosted a panel at Hofstra University to discuss proposals to improve prosecutions in the state. Some of the proposed changes included ending cash bail and allowing defendants earlier access to the evidence presented against them.

new york-criminal justice reform-prison reform-sentencing-NYUJ

Vocal Support of Criminal Justice Reforms

The NYUJ is pushing for criminal justice reform for a few reasons. In New York, cash-bail runs on a two-tiered system. This system keeps inmates who are unable to make bail imprisoned for the duration of their trials. Most of the time, these are minor, non-violent offenders. Holding people on bail is an expensive hit to taxpayers everywhere. To change this, the NYUJ proposed that those individuals should be released before their trials.

The NYUJ is also pushing for prosecutors to share evidence with the defendants earlier in the case. Their proposal, if accepted, would require prosecutors to turn over discovery material within 15 days of arraignment.

To appeal to a broader audience, advocates are suggesting a more conservative approach to criminal justice reforms. By focusing on principles like money and keeping things local, advocates have a better chance of seeing actual change. Lauren Krisai, a senior policy analyst with the Justice Action Network, concurs. By focusing the arguments on lowering taxes, it is easier to appeal to more people, she says.

An Expensive Ethical Issue

The proof is in the pudding. CNN commentator Van Jones said that over $70,000 a year is spent on a single prisoner. Jones feels that the exorbitant spending doesn’t make sense – from both a financial and ethical standpoint. “How can you spend $70,000 per year, per person, locking people up when they come home, they come home bitter and not better?”

Van Jones also points out that a similar approach has worked in the past for vastly more conservative states. In fact, reforms like the ones that the NYUJ is lobbying for have already taken place in Mississippi, and Texas. In these conservative states, criminal justice reforms are not only a financial concern, but an ethical one as well. “That’s not right or left, that’s right or wrong,” Jones said.

But it’s no secret that the NYUJ has some powerful backers. They include the NAACP, music executive Jason Flom, securities trader Rob Granieri, and hedge funder Dan Loeb and his wife, Margaret, among others. Currently, the group is creating a $500,000 television advertisement to raise awareness of early discovery disclosure.

Compromise is key

Nassau County District Attorney Madeline Singas says she would be willing to compromise on some of the proposed changes. She wants some non-violent crimes to remain ineligible for automatic pre-trial release. Singas also voiced her opposition for the fifteen-day turnaround for discovery. The attorney feared that with such early release of evidence, witness intimidation or tampering could become a real issue. She would, however, consider an accelerated disclosure of discovery pegged to a trial date.

“Just be as liberal as Texas,” Jones said in his interview. “Just be as liberal as Mississippi, and we’ll be all right in New York.” With criminal justice reforms already starting to be discussed on the federal level, we may see more states following suit. When everybody can agree to compromise, we will truly see a fairer criminal justice system.

Src: Matthew Chayes “Pitch for Changing Prosecutions ‘Save money,’ not ‘Social justice’” 3/2/19

About Brandon Sample

Brandon Sample is an attorney, author, and criminal justice reform activist. Brandon’s law practice is focused on federal criminal defense, federal appeals, federal post-conviction relief, federal civil rights litigation, federal administrative law, and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Leave a Comment

Recommended for you

Federal Halfway House – Everything You Need To Know

Over the past several weeks, I have received numerous e-mails and calls from different individuals concerning federal halfway house placements that have been reduced significantly—or denied entirely—by the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”). What is going on? A variety of things, it seems. I.  Federal Halfway House – A Brief Overview The BOP has long…

Read More

The First Step Act Bill Summary Explained : A Comprehensive Analysis

The First Step Act 2018 Bill Summary: On December 21, 2018, the President signed into law The First Step Act 2018, a bipartisan effort to reform the federal criminal justice system. The Law Office of Brandon Sample has assembled this detailed analysis of the First Step Act 2018 to help the public understand the ins…

Read More

Sentencing Reform And Federal Prison News – January 2018

We are a week into 2018 and there is much buzz about what lies ahead in the year from the courts, Congress, and the U.S. Sentencing Commission for federal prison and sentencing reform. Here’s a summary of some of the highlights. (a) Congress – Sentencing Reform Different bills remain under consideration, but none have yet…

Read More