Skip to content

Dimaya, Oh Dimaya … Where Art Thou?

If you are a federal sentencing fan like me, then you are also likely waiting for the Supreme Court’s decision in Sessions v. Dimaya, No. 15-1498 (yes, it’s now Sessions since AG Lynch is no longer there). At issue in Dimaya is whether 18 U.S.C. 16(b) is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s 2015 Johnson decision. Johnson declared the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act unconstitutionally vague. Section 16 of title 18 provides a generic definition for the term “crime of violence.” Where other provisions of the code do not define “crime of violence,” section 16 controls.
These two parts of section 16:

(a) an offense that has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another, or

(b) any other offense that is a felony and that, by its nature, involves a substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense.

Section 16(a) is known as the “force clause.” That provision is not at issue in Dimaya. If something qualifies as a “crime of violence” under the force clause, courts generally will not reach whether 16(b) also applies. Section 16(b) is known as the “residual clause.” It is very similar to the “residual clause” that was declared unconstitutional in Johnson. Dimaya is not a criminal case. Rather, it is an immigration case. It is unclear whether this is going to matter to the Supreme Court’s analysis of the issue. There was a discussion of this during oral argument back in January 2017. When will Dimaya be decided? Most likely by the end of the Court’s term, which is late this month. We could see a decision this week. I will be checking each day for a decision in Dimaya and post as soon as it is out.

About Brandon Sample

Brandon Sample is an attorney, author, and criminal justice reform activist. Brandon’s law practice is focused on federal criminal defense, federal appeals, federal post-conviction relief, federal civil rights litigation, federal administrative law, and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Leave a Comment





Recommended for you

Federal Halfway House – Everything You Need To Know

Over the past several weeks, I have received numerous e-mails and calls from different individuals concerning federal halfway house placements that have been reduced significantly—or denied entirely—by the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”). What is going on? A variety of things, it seems. I.  Federal Halfway House – A Brief Overview The BOP has long…

The First Step Act Bill Summary Explained : A Comprehensive Analysis

The First Step Act 2018 Bill Summary: On December 21, 2018, the President signed into law The First Step Act 2018, a bipartisan effort to reform the federal criminal justice system. The Law Office of Brandon Sample has assembled this detailed analysis of the First Step Act 2018 to help the public understand the ins…

Sentencing Reform And Federal Prison News – January 2018

We are a week into 2018 and there is much buzz about what lies ahead in the year from the courts, Congress, and the U.S. Sentencing Commission for federal prison and sentencing reform. Here’s a summary of some of the highlights. (a) Congress – Sentencing Reform Different bills remain under consideration, but none have yet…

Scroll To Top