Note
Five Keys to a Federal Sentencing Memorandum
A sentencing memorandum is your written argument for a specific sentence, and it is often your clearest chance to shape the judge's view before the hearing.
A sentencing memorandum, or sentencing memo, is a written argument a lawyer files with the court before a federal sentencing hearing. The defense memo tells the judge what sentence it is asking for and why, using the facts of the case, the person's life, the guideline range and the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). The prosecution often files its own.
It is often your clearest chance to shape the judge's thinking while the judge is still deciding.
After a guilty plea or a guilty verdict, sentencing is the next stage. Both sides argue to the judge, and the judge decides what sentence is right. A well-built memo makes your side of that argument clear, organized, and persuasive.

Why the memo matters
At the sentencing hearing, the lawyers speak, and the defendant gets a chance to speak to the judge. That is called "allocution." Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(i)(4).
But many judges come to the hearing with a sentence already in mind. They form that view from the presentence report and the written filings. A memo puts your side in front of the judge while the judge is still weighing the options.
So why file a memo if you will speak at the hearing anyway? Because it gives you another chance to make your case. You can lay out an organized argument without the pressure of speaking in court, and the judge can think it over before sentencing instead of hearing it for the first time from the bench.
The timeline in federal court
The memo works alongside the presentence report, or PSR. The PSR is a report written by a probation officer about the crime, your background, and the guideline range. Under Rule 32:
- Probation must give the PSR to both sides at least 35 days before sentencing, unless you waive that time. Rule 32(e)(2).
- Both sides have 14 days after getting the PSR to send written objections. Rule 32(f)(1).
- Probation must send the final PSR to the judge and the parties at least 7 days before sentencing. Rule 32(g).
When is a sentencing memorandum due?
No single federal rule sets the deadline. Rule 32 sets deadlines for the presentence report and objections, but it says nothing about sentencing memoranda (Fed. R. Crim. P. 32). The deadline comes from the district's local criminal rules, the judge's own practices, or the scheduling order entered in the case, and it varies from court to court and judge to judge.
So check three places as soon as sentencing is set: the local rules, the judge's individual practices or standing orders, and the docket in the case. Put the date on the calendar, and ask for more time before the deadline passes if you need it.
1. Focus on your strongest mitigation
"Mitigation" means facts that point toward a lower sentence. Common examples:
- Age and physical health
- Mental health
- Drug or alcohol addiction
- A hard or abusive childhood
- Past good deeds, work, and family support
- A small role in the offense
- Pressure from others
- Little or no harm caused
A few, like a small role, can lower the range under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines themselves (USSG §3B1.2). Most of the others used to be grounds for "departures," which the Guidelines removed on November 1, 2025 (amendment 836). So do not ask for a departure for them. Ask for a variance instead (see departures and variances): the judge can still weigh all of them under § 3553(a), and the Commission said facts that once supported a departure can still support a sentence outside the range. And these are only a handful of the mitigating factors that may matter in a case.
Do not list everything. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes said a lawyer should "strike the jugular and let the rest go." He meant more than "keep it short." A few well-developed arguments work better than a long list thrown at the judge in the hope that something sticks. Pick the three or four strongest points and get the most out of them.
2. Be accurate, not dramatic
There is an old saying: if neither the law nor the facts are on your side, pound the table. A smart judge sees through that as easily as a clear glass window. The better approach is to argue mitigation from the real facts of the case.
Few things hurt more than making a strong argument, only to have the prosecutor show the court that it was misleading or inaccurate. Once that happens, you lose credibility on every point. Stick to facts you can prove with records, letters, and reports.
3. Show what other courts have done
A choice is easier to make when you know someone has made it before. Judges are no different. If a judge knows a lower sentence was imposed in a similar case, the judge is more likely to consider that sentence in yours.
So do not be afraid to cite legal authority for the sentence you want. If other courts have credited the same mitigating factors on similar facts, the judge may be much more comfortable agreeing with you. Cite cases with similar facts and outcomes. Sentencing Commission data on similar defendants can help too.
4. Tie every argument to § 3553(a)
18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) tells the judge to impose a sentence "sufficient, but not greater than necessary" to meet the purposes of sentencing. That is sometimes called the "parsimony principle."
Those purposes include the need "to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment," along with deterrence and protecting the public. Show the judge how your requested sentence meets each one. That ties your request to the reasons we punish in the first place, which gives it more credibility.
Some factors help the defense directly. One is "the need to avoid unwarranted sentence disparities" among similar defendants. Another is your own history and characteristics. Both let you remind the judge of the real costs of an overly harsh sentence.
5. File early, at least a week before the hearing
As noted above, many judges have a good idea of the sentence after reading the PSR. The memo's job is to reach the judge while that idea is still forming, so the sooner the judge has it, the better.
File at least a week before the hearing. Meet any earlier deadline the court sets, and aim to file soon after the final PSR.
Keep these five keys in mind while drafting, and your memo will make a strong, credible case for the sentence you want.
How you and the people helping you can gather facts
A good memo is built from facts gathered over weeks, not days. The person being sentenced and the people who know them well are usually where those facts come from. Start now:
- Letters. Ask family members, employers, clergy, and friends to write honest letters to the judge about who the person is, what they have done for others, and how the family will support them. Specific stories work better than general praise.
- Records. Collect medical and mental health records, treatment records, school and work history, and proof of any classes or volunteer work. In some cases, the lawyer may also ask a doctor, psychologist, or other professional to write a report.
- Care with communications. If the person being sentenced is in custody, do not discuss the facts of the case on jail or prison phones, video visits, or email. Those calls and messages are usually recorded and can be used by the prosecution.
Common questions
What is a sentencing memorandum?
It is a written argument a lawyer files before a federal sentencing hearing, asking for a specific sentence and explaining why. A defense memo usually answers the presentence report, addresses the guideline range, and applies the factors the judge must weigh, such as the person's history and characteristics and the need for a sentence "sufficient, but not greater than necessary" (18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)).
How do you write a sentencing memorandum?
Most memos follow a simple structure: the sentence requested, the guideline range and any objections to it, the facts about the person and the offense, and an argument under each § 3553(a) factor, with letters and records attached as exhibits. Federal law lets the judge consider any information about the person's background, character and conduct (18 U.S.C. § 3661), so support each point with proof.
What is the difference between a sentencing memorandum and a letter to the judge?
A sentencing memorandum is a legal filing by the lawyer that argues for a sentence under the guidelines and 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). A letter of support is a personal statement from someone who knows the person, usually sent to the defense lawyer and filed with or attached to the memo. The memo can use the letters as evidence of the person's history and characteristics (18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1)).
What is the difference between a sentencing memorandum and a motion?
A motion asks the court to make a specific ruling, such as a government motion for a sentence below the range for substantial assistance (USSG §5K1.1). A sentencing memorandum is an argument about what the overall sentence should be. A request for a variance under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) is often made in the memo itself; check the court's local rules for how such requests must be filed.
When is a sentencing memorandum due?
No single federal rule sets the deadline. Rule 32 sets deadlines for the presentence report and objections but does not mention sentencing memoranda (Fed. R. Crim. P. 32), so the deadline comes from the court's local rules, the judge's practices or the scheduling order in the case. Check all three as soon as sentencing is set.
Do letters to the judge help at sentencing?
They can. Federal law puts no limit on the information about a defendant's background, character and conduct that a judge may consider at sentencing (18 U.S.C. § 3661), and the judge must consider the person's "history and characteristics" (18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1)). Letters from people who know the person well are a common way that information reaches the judge.