Note
Habeas Gap Delays: California's 120-Day Safe Harbor
The California Supreme Court set a 120-day safe harbor between state habeas petitions. Here is why that matters for the federal one-year deadline.
Written by Brandon Sample · Updated · Filed under Habeas corpus and 2255
On this page
The short answer
If you are a California prisoner, you can wait up to 120 days after a state court denies your habeas petition before filing in a higher state court. That gap will not be treated as too long. The California Supreme Court set this "safe harbor" in Robinson v. Lewis, 9 Cal. 5th 883 (2020) (No. S228137).
How much gap delay is "reasonable" is a question that has puzzled federal courts for decades. The court answered a question the Ninth Circuit asked it five years earlier. See Robinson v. Lewis, 795 F.3d 926 (9th Cir. 2015).
Why the gap matters
This matters for California prisoners, and for federal prisoners who also have California state cases. A state prisoner generally has one year to file a federal habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 after state appeals end. That one-year clock pauses while a properly filed state post-conviction petition is "pending." 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2).
In most states, "pending" includes the time to appeal a denial. But California does not have appeals in habeas cases. Instead, you file a new petition in the Court of Appeal, and then in the California Supreme Court. That is not really an "appeal" at all.
The time between those petitions is called "gap delay." If the gap is too long, the federal clock may not have been paused during it.
The problem the court fixed
Federal courts had treated California's system like other states' appeal systems. They assumed California's serial petition rule worked the same way. Many California prisoners lost their federal § 2254 petitions as untimely. Courts said the pause on the clock (tolling) ended because they waited longer than the 30 to 60 days other states usually allow for an appeal.
The California Supreme Court said that comparison was wrong. A state habeas petition is often the only full briefing a case gets.
So the court set a 120-day "safe harbor," as it called it. Within that window, a petition will "never" be too late. A delay longer than 120 days is not automatically too late. A petitioner can still show good cause.
The author's view
The author, Dale Chappell, wrote that this case also highlights the problems with the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA). He called it "a baseless law that has been picked apart by the courts over the last 25 years."
Courts say AEDPA's one-year deadline exists to promote "finality" of convictions. But what good does the one-year limit do when the state, the party with the interest in finality, says a conviction should be looked at again to avoid an injustice? Whose finality is AEDPA promoting at that point by barring any later federal challenge after a year?
Federal prisoners face their own one-year clock. A § 2255 motion generally must be filed within one year, usually counted from the date the conviction became final, under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f). For help with a 2255 motion, see 2255motion.com.
Facing a federal sentence? Book a consultation to talk it through with Brandon Sample.